Skip to content
Bestel gemakkelijk gezonde en smaakvolle maaltijden bij Eas…

The Venezuelan Crisis Could Now Define Trump's Legacy - and the United States' Role in the World

In the wake of executing a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be entering the state-building business.

In a striking media briefing at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief announced that US military forces had successfully captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then said that a delegation comprising Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be taking control of the troubled nation.

"We are going to administer the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and careful transition," he said.

What precisely "governing the state" involves is ambiguous, but the pledge marks an abrupt shift in direction for the president, rife with contradictions and significant challenges.

A leader who campaigned against "forever wars", who vehemently denounced past US efforts at regime change and who vowed to implement an "America first" international policy is now staking his presidency on effectively reconstructing a South American nation whose economic system is in shambles and whose governmental stability has been undermined by years of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was unwaveringly confident.

He stated his administration has a "unblemished record of winning" – and that this will be no different. He vowed to recruit American energy companies to rebuild Venezuela's crumbling industrial infrastructure, supplying funds for the American rebuilding project and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He declined to rule out deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to progress these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a vocal opponent of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to remember the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you break it, you own it."

An Altered International Stance

The US has redefined Venezuela's future – for better or worse.

Trump came to power nearly a year ago promising to be a diplomat, but over the past year he has shown that he is more than willing to use military force worldwide.

In the past week, he ordered air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck atomic sites in Iran, suspected drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

Unlike past actions, which have mostly involved rockets and warplanes that reduce the risk of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela operation – and his pledges to the future of that nation – are notably distinct.

His objective, he said during his press conference, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Response at Home and Abroad

That twist on Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - slogan could be tough for some of Trump's backers to accept.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump loyalist who split from the president after charging him of abandoning his political base, was swift to denounce the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's endless military aggression and support of overseas conflicts is understandable because we are forced to fund it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another prominent Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on arms and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to reclaim confiscated US oil and stop fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers stood by the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing the military action against a "criminal regime" as "firm and legitimate".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his press conference, the president said the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" priorities because it ensured US hemispheric security and provided a steady source of oil.

He resurrected the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American foreign policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Trump Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US preeminence in the Western Hemisphere will never be challenged again."

The goal of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "protect commerce, land and assets that are central to our national security." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's choice to apprehend Maduro will provoke larger concerns in global politics, however, and impact American relations with the world's other significant global powers.

The Chinese government released a statement expressing surprise and condemning what it said was a irresponsible attack on a sovereign nation.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar condemnations of Russia following its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to broker a peace deal between those two nations – one that has frequently appeared to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, expressed worry about the signal Trump's actions might send.

"My primary worry is now Russia will use this to justify their unlawful and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to justify an invasion of Taiwan."

Opposition and Legal Scrutiny

Trump's Democratic critics were blunter.

"The United States should not be administering other countries for any purpose," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in endless wars and regime change missions that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker stated Maduro is a lawbreaker and a dictator with a record of human rights abuses. But he condemned Trump's decision not to consult with congressional leaders before launching the attack.

"Donald Trump has the legal duty to abide by the law and protect institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First requires."

Trump, in his press conference, said that he chose not to inform Congress because he was concerned they would "disclose" details of the operation before the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That mission was a success – with no American casualties and limited damage to US equipment. Trump, with his characteristic confidence, described the operation as a "daring raid" and "among the most stunning, successful and impressive displays of American military might and competency in US history."

Now he is gambling his legacy on that victory continuing, as the US says it will take over running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that actually means is unclear. He and his administration must fortify a nation that has been in turmoil for years while calming a region that is sure to be cautious of what Trump's international strategy has in store for them.

Written by

Janet George

Voedingsdeskundige en oprichter van Easy Food Factory, gespecialiseerd in evenwichtige maaltijdplanning.

Easy Food Factory

Type to search articles.